
- Image by JohnnyRokkit via Flickr
By Tom Pergola
In my 30 plus years in the fine art world, I’ve asked many artists this question and the usual response I get is “I don’t know, I see it on other paintings”. Personally I don’t see any reason for it. All it tells the potential buyer is that it hasn’t sold in 2, 5, or 10 years or whatever the case may be.
The customer really doesn’t want to hear that nobody has been interested or purchased it for a long period of time. Why do they even have to know when it was painted. What’s the difference? They may ask themselves, “Why hasn’t this painting sold yet, am I doing the right thing?” This might turn him or her off and ruin the sale.
If an artist does insist on dating their paintings I suggest they do it on the back so it’s not in plain sight. The only thing that should be on the front of a paint is a clear signature. Some high end artists now even feel that it’s “cool” not to put a signature on a painting or possibly on the back of the canvas only. It’s the new trend.
Related articles by Zemanta
- 2010 Art Market Predictions – artmarketblog.com (artmarketblog.com)
- Bedroom artwork is up! (homedesign.marthastewart.com)
- Discover Local Artists: Sibel Kocabasi and Brian Somerville (pbpulse.com)
- Galleries galore: a tour around Tokyo’s teeming art scene (guardian.co.uk)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=5558dc66-c316-4430-9739-581427a84702)
I’ve (almost) always signed and dated my work on the back. I guess I’m trendy…